Peter Fam: The Human Rights Implications of Tampering with Our DNA
World Council for Health hosted an emergency hearing on 27 November 2023 featuring Peter Fam and seven other leading experts to address the legal implications of DNA contamination in Covid-19 mRNA vaccines. This was a follow-up to the 9 October 2023 panel seen by hundreds of thousands. Register below to receive exclusive updates about #Plasmidgate as more information becomes available. Please note by completing this form you will be subscribed to the free WCH email newsletter.
Watch this important video on Rumble, Facebook, Bitchute & Spotify.
Poisoning the Well of Humanity: Tampering with Our DNA
“We are here to consider the human rights implications of the well of humanity being tempered with and possibly poisoned.”
Like Willem Van Aardt, Peter Fam’s presentation focused on the international context, observing that all countries represented on the panel had covenanted into seven key UN agreements that enshrine human rights.
In addition to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights mentioned previously, he emphasised a lesser-known treaty, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which is the most relevant modern human rights treaty for the issues under discussion, as it enshrines the general principles of bioethics.
- Article 6 has to do with consent, emphasising that free and informed consent of the people concerned in any medical intervention is necessary and must be based on adequate information. Furthermore, “In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.” This means that a politician or a government cannot substitute some ruling or order or direction over an individual’s fully informed and free consent.
- Article 18 deals with decision-making and addressing bioethical issues, and states that, “declarations of all conflicts of interests and appropriate sharing of knowledge” should be promoted. In this regard, Fahrie Hassan’s research into conflicts of interest is of great value.
It is hard to believe that it has taken less than four years for the world to turn away from these agreements that enshrine some of the very best values and intentions of the human family.
As Peter observed, this Declaration has been completely bypassed and ignored by the profit-hungry transnational pharmaceutical corporations responsible for this iatrogenic catastrophe, and by the governments who have guaranteed their indemnity. They are recklessly tampering with our DNA.
Don’t forget to sign up below to receive exclusive email updates as more information becomes available!
This article was written by World Council for Health Correspondent Alice Ashwell, PhD.
About Peter Fam
- Peter Fam is a human rights specialist lawyer and the Principal lawyer at Maat’s Method, the only non-Government funded human rights law firm in Australia.
- He has a background in human rights focused civil litigation in both the private and government sectors, having worked on large-scale cases in Australia’s highest courts and in most jurisdictions.
- Peter focusses primarily on tort law, administrative law, privacy law, discrimination law, and other areas of civil litigation with a human rights focus. He also has particular expertise regarding the international human rights framework that Australia is a signatory to.
- His goal is to defend and advocate for the inherent dignity and rights every man and woman hold by virtue of their humanity.
This is an edited segment from the emergency hearing hosted by WCH on 27 November 2023 with Willem van Aardt, Katie Ashby-Koppens, Julian Gillespie, Wendy Low, Sue Grey, Peter Fam, and Fahrie Hassan.