Deanna McLeod: Evidence-Based Analysis of the Pfizer 6 Month Trial

Deanna McLeod: More Harm Than Good: An evidence-based analysis of the Pfizer 6 month trial

Deanna McLeod is a medical peer-review publications expert, an evidence-based data analysis expert, as well as a Covid data analysis expert.

This is an edited segment from the weekly live General Assembly meeting on December 20, 2021. The full meeting can be viewed here.

Deanna McLeod speaker


Here’s what WCH members, staff, and affiliates are saying about Deanna’s presentation:

“Brilliant, clear presentation.”Dr. Maria Hubmer-Mogg

“This great analysis by CCCA. Shows again the level of deception and shenanigans in the covid agenda.” -Dr Mark Trozzi

“Thank you very much, great work and great analysis.” -Ghizlaine Casablanca

“Vitally important presentation, Deana. We will share widely.” -Dr. Tess Lawrie

“Thank you for a great presentation.” -Kat Lindley

“Really wonderful!” -Maria Emilia Gadelha Serra

“Thank you Deanna, fantastic!” -David Wiseman

“So clear, thank you.” -Emma Brierly

“Thank you, that was brilliant.” -Sue Grey

“Thank you, Deanna! Amazing presentation!” -Zoe Strickland

“Thanks Deanna! Great critique and presentation.” -Karen eg

“So good to see the scientific method being used properly. Science and bioethics need to be reinstated asap!” -Rob

“Excellent presentation.” -Rochagné Kilian

“AMAZING!!! Thank you much!!! This is the light in the tunnel of these “vaccination s”!!! We are grateful!!” -Zafeiria Kakaletri Greek Medical Freedom Alliance

“Outstanding presentation.” -Rima

“Thanks Deanna, I watched the CCA video and shared it on my twitter account. It has received lots of comments and many people shocked about what it reveals. Well done!” -Nathi Mdladla

“Thanks Deanna, a highly informative presentation.” -Carmen

“Thanks Deanna. Big respect to the CCCA team!” -Dr Mark Trozzi



  1. Thank you for all efforts being made to give evidence based information freely to the public. It is immensely appreciated and although it is not always evident it is supported and valuable.

  2. Very well done. This analysis, along with the VAERS data should be the nail in the coffin to these experimental gene therapies. So many people will be held accountable in Nuremberg 2.0.

  3. On the “this morning” TV program UK Dr Hilary Jones stated that the yellow card scheme was a waste of time. Untruthful etc to “tear it up”. Conflict of interest – owns a vaccine company

  4. I am grateful for a Canadian Dr who took it upon herself to share important data with the WHO. So proud of any Dr who speaks up in Canada as they are persecuted for it. Many doctors in Canada are cowards who don’t even try to see their patients in person. My family doctor has not seen me in person in two years and I am 65. The government healthcare system is backfiring in this Covid time. Dr’s can make money with phone appointments. They don’t need to be good because they get paid anyway. If the majority of Dr’s in Canada really stood up to the government, the government would have to listen. In Canada, they have let people die because they banned all out of hospital early Covid treatment of Covid for 2 years and postponed other major physical and mental health treatments for patients and scared people so much so they don’t dare go to the hospital for anything.

  5. I am grateful Canada has sites like this that are looking for the truth. No medicine, or drug, is fool proof. We humans are created unique and none can fit all of us. Most know this so also realize the quick development was a sham. No safety measures are in place. It seems fear is the game being played to scare us to do .. ?
    Anything we are told? I hope not.
    This is refreshing and like was said above, it’s a lonely thing to walk with knowledge people are too frightened to acknowledge. The ingredients in these gene therapy/vaccine shots are also not all that is in them.
    It is all unknown…an experiment. We are the subjects. The governments have bought into it and how do we get help for even ordinary things when we are unsure who is okay to go to?

  6. Deanna McLeod – would you mind responding here about the claims from Afp factcheckers about your presentation?

    Thanking you in advance!

  7. so what you are saying we should not vaccinate or just wait for some years to decide!
    so would that mean that the hospitals would not be overrun and nurses would not be stressed to quit?

  8. this is an opinion of 500 of our 92173 doctors in Canada
    as uninformed patient whom should we trust?

  9. I downloaded the trial data presented to FDA from the FDA site a long time ago and could see that there was a bit of statistical fraud going on straight away. But what really would interest me is what was the placebo?? I remember reading somewhere that it was not a saline solution but rather another already approved vaccine, in fact a meningitis vaccine. This would make a lot of sense as if it was a saline solution, why would anyone have an adverse reaction to it? Why would anyone die from it? If 14 died in the unvaccinated group of healthy individuals and only 2 from Covid, what did the other 12 die from? Saline solution? That would not make any sense! But if the placebo was another vaccine, which would also have it’s list of adverse effects including death, many which would be similar to the adverse events reported, it would make sense that the placebo group had adverse reactions to the “placebo”. Can anyone absolutely verify that the placebo was a saline solution?

  10. An excellent analysis. Wish the Austrian authorities would read this report ! The government has now made the innoculation obligatory for all people living in Austria, including children, We…. who refuse this vaccination will be fined !!! Ginette Kimberger (

  11. How do one become a Covid data analysis expert?? I don’t think anyone is expert on this field already. This is the first time for everyone to experience this pandemic, nobody is an expert YET.

  12. Can you parse total world-wide conventional/attenuated vaccinations data with mRNA injection data? Maybe if we compare countries with high MRNA injections to Low & high attenuated vaccinated countries with high infections and COVID recovered individuals there could be a useful pattern or signal of adverse effects?

    Here are some sites I found but I’m not an expert clinical data analyst.

  13. Yes but if doctors speak out against this they are cancelled lose their jobs etc. Why would you trust government censorship. That’s what the nazis did.

  14. Could you explain the likelihood of ending up in the hospital because of covid vs hospitalization from vaccine side effects

  15. Watching the grand-jury videos now. I truly hope that the egregious spelling errors on your slides have been fixed.

    For example…”acctually” and “increades”

    This battle is too important. Not reviewing your presentations for errors before publication is simply unacceptable.

  16. Thank you so much for sharing this video.
    I appreciate Deanna’s McLeod analysis and I am very sorry there is no transcript available.
    I understand the challenge- still it would be of great value and help in spreading the truth.
    All the best,

  17. Deanna MacLeod, is an expert witness at the disciplinary hearing of Dr. Mark Trozzi. I’ve been watching this today. I hope that she isn’t feeling upset by the horrifying treatment via the lawyer at the College of Physicians & Surgeons, Ontario, hearing. Ms. MacLeond is obviously a very positive and productive person who believes in integrity. I wrote the following on the website of the CPSO (there’s an email bot that comes up on their website).

    I want this on the record:

    I am a former Court Reporter & Clerk of the courts in Ontario. I have literally seen hundreds of lawyers before the bench.

    Ms. Emily Graham, LL.B., is absolutely badgering the witness via an aggressive attitude and as such, her behaviour is totally inappropriate.

    Emily Graham, LL.B., continues with her badgering style of questioning. 3:21 p.m., June 15, 2023.
    This is in spite of the witness, Deanna MacLeod, requesting her to be less aggressive and display some kindness.

    Sherry Laing, Chair, condones the bullying of the witness via Emily Graham, LL.B’s aggressive and badgering behaviour. This is not acceptable. Sherry Laing, Chair makes no ruling as to the behaviour of the lawyer. These people involved in this panel do not conduct themselves professionally, but instead favour bullying techniques. It is not appropriate to treat the witnesses with hostility.

      1. Wow, I hope Ms. McLeod feels better than I do! Please make that correction:
        Sorry, I misspelled Ms. McLeod’s surname, 3rd line from the top.

Comments are closed.